Rosemary T. Steeno v. Virgil T. Hunter David Parker Covenant Transport, Inc.

34 F.3d 1073 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Rosemary T. STEENO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Virgil T. HUNTER; David Parker; Covenant Transport, Inc., Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-55012. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 23, 1994. * Decided Aug. 29, 1994. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, HUG and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Rosemary Steeno appeals pro se the district court's Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) dismissal of Steeno's diversity action seeking damages for injuries she suffered in an auto accident. The district court dismissed Steeno's action on the ground that it was barred by the applicable California statute of limitations. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 3 On appeal, Steeno contends that the district court erred by granting defendants' motion to dismiss because the statute of limitations was tolled under California's equitable tolling rule during the pendency of her state court action.…