Philip L. Stimac v. William Barr California Department of Education

34 F.3d 1073 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Philip L. STIMAC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William BARR; California Department of Education; et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-15033. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 23, 1994. * Decided Aug. 29, 1994. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, HUG and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Philip L. Stimac appeals pro se the district court's denial of his post-judgment motion for lack of jurisdiction. Stimac also appeals the district court's denial of his motion for reconsideration. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 3 * Background 4 In the underlying action, Stimac alleged that numerous federal and state officials violated his civil rights by improperly handling his discrimination complaint against his former employer. Stimac also brought a claim under the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. Sec. 552 ("FOIA"). The district court dismissed Stimac's civil…