Hing-Tin Ngai v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

Good Law
34 F.3d 1073·1994 WL 424324·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 32307
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 12, 199493-70269California748 words

Opinion

Opinion

34 F.3d 1073 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. HING-TIN NGAI, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 93-70269. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 3, 1994. * Decided Aug. 12, 1994. Before: WRIGHT, KOZINSKI, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Hing-Tin Ngai, a native and citizen of Hong Kong, petitions for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals which denied his petition to reopen deportation proceedings after a remand from this court. Our remand directed the BIA to consider several factors favorable to Ngai when it ruled upon his petition to reopen. Hing-Tin Ngai v. INS, No. 90-70116 (July 22, 1991). Ngai seeks to reopen deportation proceedings in order to obtain an adjustment of status to that of lawful permanent resident under 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1254 (a) or Sec. 1255. We affirm. 3 1. Ngai seeks to have us reconsider issues that were already considered and rejected by us…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.