United States v. Michael Edward Hunter

34 F.3d 1074 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael Edward HUNTER, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-10028. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 3, 1994. * Decided Aug. 12, 1994. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, HUG and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Michael Edward Hunter appeals his sentence of 57 months imposed after he pleaded guilty to assault with a dangerous weapon with intent to do bodily harm in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 113 (c). Hunter challenges the district court's finding regarding the seriousness of injury sustained by the victim. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 and we affirm. 3 We review the district court's interpretation and application of the Sentencing Guidelines de novo and the factual findings underlying a sentence determination for clear error. United States v. Hinton, No. 93-10323, slip op. 8489, 8505-06 (9th Cir. July 28, 1994). 4 The…