United States v. Louis James Lewis

34 F.3d 1074 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Louis James LEWIS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-50189. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Aug. 11, 1994. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, HUG and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Louis James Lewis appeals his conviction and 210-month sentence imposed following a jury trial for possession with intent to distribute cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. Sec. 841 (a)(1). 3 Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Lewis's counsel filed a brief stating that he finds no meritorious issues for review. Counsel also filed a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Lewis filed a pro se supplemental brief challenging the reliability of his in-court identification by government witnesses and alleging several errors arising out of the prosecution's use of identification testimony at the trial. We have jurisdiction under 21 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we…