United States v. Charles W. White

Good Law
34 F.3d 1075
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 12, 199493-30363California1,650 words

Opinion

Opinion

34 F.3d 1075 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Charles W. WHITE, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 93-30363, 93-30366. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 12, 1994. * Decided Aug. 12, 1994. Before: GOODWIN, D.W. NELSON, and HALL, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Charles White and Richard Strickland appeal their convictions for possession of unauthorized access devices; interstate transportation of stolen property; receiving, delivering, retaining, or concealing stolen or forged U.S. Treasury bonds; and conspiracy to commit offenses against the United States. I. 3 White and Strickland contend that the district court erred when it denied their motion to suppress evidence obtained by sheriff's deputies during a search of the defendants' motel room and luggage. 4 The facts surrounding the officers' entry into White and Strickland's motel room were disputed at trial. Defendants contend that the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.