Eric Haywood Weinstein v. Samuel Lewis, Eric Haywood Weinstein v. Samuel A. Lewis

34 F.3d 1075 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Eric Haywood WEINSTEIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Samuel LEWIS, et al., Defendants-Appellees. Eric Haywood WEINSTEIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Samuel A. LEWIS, et al., Defendants-Appellees. Nos. 94-15051, 94-15065. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 3, 1994. * Decided Aug. 12, 1994. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, HUG and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Eric Haywood Weinstein, an Arizona state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's order denying his consolidated motion for relief from judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) in his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 actions. 1 We review for an abuse of discretion, Yniques v. Cabral, 985 F.2d 1031, 1034 (9th Cir.1993), and affirm. 3 A district court may grant a motion for relief from judgment if the moving party can show: (1) mistake, surprise, or excusable neglect; (2) newly discovered evidence; (3) fraud or other misconduct; (4) a void…