United States v. Arthur Rex Rochelle

34 F.3d 1075 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Arthur Rex ROCHELLE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-30357. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 3, 1994. * Decided Aug. 11, 1994. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, HUG and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Arthur Rex Rochelle appeals his 27-month sentence, imposed following entry of guilty pleas to wire fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1343 , manufacturing armor-piercing ammunition in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 922 (a)(7), and being an ex-felon in possession of two firearms in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 922 (g). 3 Rochelle contends the district court erred by (1) treating two prior convictions as unrelated for the purpose of calculating his criminal history score, and (2) treating as relevant conduct at least two firearms which were not included in the counts of conviction and to which he did not stipulate when the court calculated…