Wilma Wilson v. Workers Compensation Appeals Board, State of California Alpha Graphix, Inc. Safeco Insurance Co. Doris Nistler

34 F.3d 1075 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Wilma WILSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD, STATE OF CALIFORNIA; Alpha Graphix, Inc.; Safeco Insurance Co.; Doris Nistler, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-56687. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 23, 1994. * Decided Aug. 29, 1994. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, HUG and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Wilma Wilson appeals pro se the district court's denial of her motion to reconsider the district court's dismissal of her action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 3 We review the denial of a motion to reconsider under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) for abuse of discretion, and we will reverse "only upon a clear showing of abuse of discretion." Molloy v. Wilson, 878 F.2d 313, 315 (9th Cir.1989). We construe Wilson's motion to reconsider as a Rule 60(b) motion because it was filed more than…