United States v. Dale Anthony Stephens

Good Law
35 F.3d 451·94 Daily Journal DAR 12912·1994 WL 495293·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 24813·94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7058
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 13, 199493-50141California1,234 words

Opinion

Opinion

O'Scannlain, J.

Is a federal drug law offender entitled to an evidentiary hearing during sentencing to challenge the constitutionality of a prior conviction used to enhance the sentence?

I

Dale Stephens was arrested at his residence on July 16, 1992 by agents of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms who had acted on a tip from an informant that Stephens was selling cocaine.

On July 31, 1992, the government filed a three-count indictment against Stephens, charging him with possession of cocaine with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1) (count I), use and possession of a firearm in relation to a narcotics offense in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924 (c)(1) (count II), and (3) being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924 (g)(1) (count III). On August 20, 1992, the government filed an Information notifying Stephens that it intended to use a prior April 12, 1991 state court narcotics conviction to enhance his sentence under count I. Stephens had pled guilty in that prior conviction.

Stephens pled guilty to counts I and II on November 3, 1992 pursuant to a plea agreement. Stephens never filed a response to the government’s Information.

In…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.