Larry D. Good v. Robert Borg William Duncan

35 F.3d 570 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Larry D. GOOD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Robert BORG; William Duncan, Respondents-Appellees. No. 94-15416. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 7, 1994. * Decided Sept. 13, 1994. Before: HALL, WIGGINS, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Larry Good, a California state prisoner, appeals the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 habeas corpus petition challenging his state conviction for manufacturing methamphetamine. Good contends the trial court denied his right to due process and compulsory process by denying his motion to depose a witness who would have impeached the testimony of a state witness. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2253 . We review the denial of a Sec. 2254 petition de novo, Thomas v. Brewer, 923 F.2d 1361, 1364 (9th Cir.1991), and affirm. 3 Good contends the trial court's refusal to transport a defense witness or to permit his deposition…