William Grant v. George Wong, President of Bel Air Market, William Grant v. Arsenio Hall

35 F.3d 570 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. William GRANT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. George WONG, President of Bel Air Market, Defendant-Appellee. William GRANT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Arsenio HALL, Defendant-Appellee. Nos. 94-15478, 94-15499. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 23, 1994. * Decided Aug. 30, 1994. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, HUG, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 In this consolidated action, William P. Grant, appeals pro se, the district court's dismissal of his two complaints prior to service of process. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 3 Frivolous in forma pauperis complaints may be dismissed sua sponte before service of process under section 1915(d). Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 324 (1989). We review the district court's determination that a complaint is frivolous under section 1915(d) for abuse of discretion. Denton v. Hernandez, 112 S.Ct. 1728, 1734 (1992).…