C.W.B. Crane Inc. v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co.

35 F.3d 570 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. C.W.B. CRANE INC.; C.B. Crane Inc.; Glenn Ball, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. HARTFORD ACCIDENT & INDEMNITY CO., erroneously sued as The Hartford and Hartford Fire Insurance Company, Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-15388. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 13, 1994. * Decided Sept. 15, 1994. 1 Before: CHOY, NOONAN, Circuit Judges, and MARQUEZ, ** District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 Appellant C.B.W. Crane, Inc. ("Crane") appeals the dismissal of his suit pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted under California law. We affirm. 4 Crane claims that the district court erred when it considered the insurance coverage of CAS & Sons, Inc., d/b/a Auto Sports Towing ("CAS & Sons"), in determining that Crane's underinsurance coverage under a policy provided by Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company ("Hartford") does…