Danny Fabricant v. Ivalee Henry Attorney General of the State of California

35 F.3d 570 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Danny FABRICANT, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Ivalee HENRY; Attorney General of the State of California, Respondents-Appellees. No. 93-55994. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 8, 1994. * Decided Aug. 31, 1994. 1 Before: HUG, WIGGINS, and NOONAN, Circuit Judges 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Danny Fabricant ("Petitioner") appeals the district court's dismissal of his petition for writ of habeas corpus. Petitioner challenges the constitutionality of his conviction and sentence in a California court for possession of methamphetamine. I. Sufficiency of the Evidence 4 Petitioner argues that he may not be convicted of the offense because no evidence was introduced of the concentration of methamphetamine in the substance possessed by Petitioner. 5 Ordinarily, we will review the evidence adduced at trial to determine whether any rational trier of fact could have found proof of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.…