Dean v. County of Yavapai

35 F.3d 570 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Michael DEAN, on behalf of self and all other employees of Yavapai County similarly situated; Ernie Cox, on behalf of self and all other employees of Yavapai County similarly situated; Frank Valentine, Plaintiff-Appellants, v. COUNTY OF YAVAPAI, a body politic of the State of Arizona, Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-15520. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 11, 1994. * Decided Sept. 14, 1994. 1 Before: NOONAN and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges, and EZRA, ** District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 Deputy Sheriffs of Yavapai County (deputies) filed suit against Yavapai County (County) seeking compensation for on-call time. The district court granted partial summary judgment for the County holding that it was entitled to a good faith defense pursuant to 29 U.S.C. Sec. 259 and that the deputies' state law claims were subject to a one year statute of limitations. After trial, the court dismissed the…