Lawrence S. Bittaker v. James Gomez, Lawrence S. Bittaker v. James Rowland

35 F.3d 570 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Lawrence S. BITTAKER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James GOMEZ, et al., Defendants-Appellees. Lawrence S. BITTAKER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James ROWLAND, et al., Defendants-Appellees. Nos. 92-16912, 93-15173. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 14, 1994. * Decided Sept. 8, 1994. Before: HUG, SCHROEDER and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Lawrence S. Bittaker appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the defendants in his consolidated Sec. 1983 actions against several officials of the San Quentin State Prison, where plaintiff is incarcerated. 3 Between August 15, 1988, and March 13, 1990, plaintiff filed four separate civil rights actions in federal district court alleging numerous violations of his constitutional rights. After receiving submissions from both parties, the district court granted the defendants' motion for summary judgment on or dismissal of…