Clarence Larkins v. Delta Air Lines, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Clarence Larkins v. Delta Air Lines, Inc., a Delaware Corporation

35 F.3d 571 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Clarence LARKINS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DELTA AIR LINES, INC., a Delaware Corporation, Defendant-Appellant. Clarence LARKINS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DELTA AIR LINES, INC., a Delaware Corporation, Defendant-Appellee. Nos. 92-36980, 93-35158 and 92-37023. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted July 14, 1994. Decided Sept. 15, 1994. 1 Before: TANG, FERGUSON, and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges 2 MEMORANDUM * 3 This diversity action arose when Delta Air Lines, Inc. terminated Clarence Larkins's employment. Larkins alleged that Delta acted in violation of the Oregon Handicapped Persons Civil Rights Act, O.R.S. 659.400 to .435. At trial, Larkins litigated two claims. First, Larkins alleged that Delta failed to reinstate an occupationally injured employee to suitable alternative work, in violation of O.R.S. 659.420. Second, Larkins alleged that Delta failed to accommodate a physical impairment, in…