Charles E. McClure v. J. Martinez, Warden Grant Woods, Attorney General of the State of Arizona

Good Law
35 F.3d 571·1994 WL 497660·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 32358
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 13, 199494-15656California1,129 words

Opinion

Opinion

35 F.3d 571 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Charles E. McCLURE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. J. MARTINEZ, Warden; Grant Woods, Attorney General of the State of Arizona, Respondents-Appellees. No. 94-15656. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 7, 1994. * Decided Sept. 13, 1994. Before: HALL, WIGGINS and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Charles E. McClure, an Arizona state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 habeas petition challenging his conviction for child molestation. We review de novo, Norris v. Risley, 878 F.2d 1178, 1180 (9th Cir.1989), and we dismiss in part and affirm in part. 3 The judgment of the district court in this case was entered July 1, 1992. On July 23, 1992, McClure filed a motion for reconsideration of the district court's July 1 judgment. By order entered April 7, 1993, the district court denied McClure's motion for reconsideration. On May 10, 1993, McClure…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.