Kenneth Lee Krause v. David E. Watson Sherman Hatcher Charles L. Wolff, Jr. Anthony Caito John Axtel J. Draney James Cannon C. Kershaw

35 F.3d 571 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Kenneth Lee KRAUSE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. David E. WATSON; Sherman Hatcher; Charles L. Wolff, Jr.; Anthony Caito; John Axtel; J. Draney; James Cannon; C. Kershaw, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-16539. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 23, 1994. * Decided Aug. 30, 1994. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, HUG, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Kenneth Lee Krause, a Nevada state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's order granting summary judgment for prison officials in his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action. Krause alleged that his due process rights were violated in a prison disciplinary hearing. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We decline to address for the first time on appeal Krause's argument regarding lack of discovery, see Sablan v. Department of Fin., 856 F.2d 1317 , 1327 (9th Cir.1988), and affirm for the reasons set forth in the district court's order,…