Schwemberger v. Regents of University of California

35 F.3d 571 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Michael SCHWEMBERGER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The REGENTS OF the UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, Jeanne M. Wilson, individually, Kjell Doksum, individually, Seinwen Carney, individually, Margret Distasi, individually, Thomas Laqueur, individually, John Gausted, individually, Hug McLean, individually, Daniel Melia, individually, Robert Knapp, individually, Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-15995. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 23, 1994. * Decided Aug. 30, 1994. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, HUG and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Michael Schwemberger appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment for the Regents of the University of California (Regents) and named individuals in his discrimination action alleging numerous federal and state causes of action. Schwemberger contends the district court erred by finding his causes of action were barred by the applicable statutes of…