United States v. Ramon Martinez Lopez

35 F.3d 572 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ramon Martinez LOPEZ, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-10755. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 7, 1994. * Decided Sept. 13, 1994. Before: HALL, WIGGINS, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Ramon Martinez Lopez appeals his conviction following jury trial for conspiracy to distribute heroin, in violation of 21 U.S.C. Secs. 846 , 841(a)(1), and possessing with intent to distribute heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C. Sec. 841 (a)(1). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Lopez's counsel filed a brief stating that he finds no meritorious issues for review, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Lopez contends in his pro se supplemental brief that: (1) the district court abused its discretion by permitting proof of three heroin sales; (2) the evidence was insufficient to sustain his conviction for conspiracy; and…