United States v. Charles Frank Johnson

35 F.3d 572 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Charles Frank JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-56502. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 7, 1994. * Decided Sept. 13, 1994. Before: HALL, WIGGINS, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Charles Frank Johnson appeals pro se the district court's denial of his motion to reconsider the dismissal of his petition for relief under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 . Johnson challenges his conviction and sentence for conspiracy and narcotics violations on the grounds that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel at trial and the district court misapplied the Sentencing Guidelines. We have jurisdiction and we affirm. 3 We review de novo both the district court's denial of section 2255 relief, United States v. Arellanes, 767 F.2d 1353, 1357 (9th Cir.1985), and the legal question whether a defendant received ineffective assistance of…