United States v. Kalani Entendencia, AKA Kalani P. Kaaikala

35 F.3d 572 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kalani ENTENDENCIA, aka Kalani P. Kaaikala, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-30367. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 2, 1994. * Decided Aug. 31, 1994. Before: WRIGHT, KOZINSKI, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Kalani Entendencia was prosecuted for bank fraud and pled guilty. See 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1344 . He was duly sentenced for that crime. It happened that he committed that offense while he was on supervised release, and the district court determined that his new offense had violated the conditions of his supervised release. He was duly sentenced for that violation. He claims that his double jeopardy rights were violated because he incurred two punishments for the same act. We affirm. BACKGROUND 3 In 1991, Entendencia was convicted of bank fraud and was sentenced to 30 months imprisonment plus a supervised release period of…