United States v. Michael John Cooper
Opinion
Opinion
35 F.3d 572 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael John COOPER, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-50273. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 23, 1994. * Decided Aug. 30, 1994. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, HUG and RYMER, Circuit Judges. MEMORANDUM ** Michael John Cooper appeals his 45-month sentence imposed following a guilty plea to bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 2113 (a). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Cooper's counsel filed a motion to withdraw as counsel of record, and a brief stating that he found no arguable issues for review. Cooper's pro se supplemental brief identified one possible issue for review: whether the district court erred by adjusting Cooper's offense level for obstruction of justice based upon his failure to disclose a prior alias to a pretrial services officer. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 1…