United States v. Freddie Lee Brown, United States of America v. Antoine Lemorre Phillips

35 F.3d 572 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Freddie Lee BROWN, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Antoine Lemorre PHILLIPS, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 93-50404, 93-50408. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 2, 1994. * Decided Aug. 30, 1994. Before: Browning, Farris, and Leavy, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Freddie Lee Brown and Antoine Lemorre Phillips appeal their convictions for robbing a Postal Service letter carrier. 18 U.S.C. Sec. 2114 . We affirm. 3 * The district court did not unduly restrict defense witnesses' opportunities to rebut Glass's testimony regarding Brown's stride. Although the court initially indicated that it would limit testimony regarding the limp, it gave defense witnesses latitude to tell the jury about the nature of Brown's injury and its effect on his stride. Brown testified that he had broken his leg in a 1978 car…