United States v. Carlos Felix-Orosco

35 F.3d 572 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carlos FELIX-OROSCO, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-10395. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 7, 1994. * Decided Sept. 13, 1994. Before: HALL, WIGGINS and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Carlos Felix-Orosco appeals his 60-month sentence imposed following entry of a guilty plea to conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. Secs. 841 (a)(1), 846. 3 Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Felix-Orosco's counsel submitted a brief identifying two possible issues for review: whether the district court erred by (1) declining to grant a downward adjustment as a minimal participant pursuant to U.S.S.G. Sec. 3B1.2; and (2) increasing his offense level pursuant to U.S.S.G. Sec. 2D1.1(b)(1) for possession of a firearm during the offense. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 .…