United States v. Victor J. Cordero

35 F.3d 572 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Victor J. CORDERO, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-35955. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 7, 1994. * Decided Sept. 13, 1994. Before: HALL, WIGGINS, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Victor Cordero, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 motion to set aside his conviction for conspiracy to distribute cocaine, possession of cocaine with intent to distribute, and use of a telephone to facilitate the conspiracy. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 . We review de novo, United States v. Angelone, 894 F.2d 1129, 1130 (9th Cir.1990), and affirm. 3 Cordero contends that (1) the district court erred by failing to provide him with findings and conclusions of law to explain the denial of his Sec. 2255 motion; (2) trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance of counsel; (3)…