United States v. Maurice Mosley

35 F.3d 573 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Maurice MOSLEY, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-50148. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Aug. 2, 1994. Decided Aug. 31, 1994. 1 Before: O'SCANNLAIN and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges; MERHIGE, * District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Maurice Mosley appeals his conviction of six counts of armed robbery of federally-insured banks in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 2113 (a)(d) and one count of use or possession of a firearm during the commission of an offense in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 924 (c). 4 * Mosley asserts that the district court erred when it allowed the government to call witness Douglas Goodin to testify as an expert in photographic comparisons. 5 Goodin, an agent with the Federal Bureau of Investigation, testified that he had subjected a bank photo of the robbery to digital imaging processing, a procedure that sharpens pictures. He…