United States v. Amin Osorio-Arce

35 F.3d 573 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Amin OSORIO-ARCE, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 93-30468, 94-30003. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 12, 1994. * Decided Sept. 14, 1994. Before: BROWNING, WRIGHT and CANBY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Amin Osorio-Arce appeals his sentence for violating 21 U.S.C. Secs. 2 , 841(a)(1) and 841(b)(1)(B). Judge Zilly enhanced his offense level under U.S.S.G. Sec. 1B1.3(a) based upon other relevant drug dealings. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 and 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3742 (a). We affirm. 3 We review for abuse of discretion estimates of relevant drug quantities, United States v. Ayers, 924 F.2d 1468, 1481 (9th Cir.1991), and find none. The district court's estimates are supported by testimony of two of Osorio-Arce's associates-turned-informants, Jerald Eck and Lonnie Sylvan. 4 Nor did the court err by allowing Eck to testify to…