Subramaniam v. Vijendira v. United States

35 F.3d 573 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Subramaniam V. VIJENDIRA, Defendant-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee. No. 93-10714. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Aug. 10, 1994. Decided Sept. 6, 1994. Before: NORRIS, THOMPSON and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * OVERVIEW 2 Subramaniam V. Vijendira appeals his conviction for two counts of alien smuggling and two counts of visa fraud. He argues there is insufficient evidence to support his conviction. Vijendira also asserts his conviction should be reversed because of errors before the grand jury, failure of the government to provide exculpatory evidence until just prior to trial, and a variety of trial errors. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 1 DISCUSSION A. Sufficiency of the Evidence 3 Vijendira's first argument is that there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction for alien smuggling and visa fraud.…