United States v. Fritz Tenijieth, Jr.

35 F.3d 573 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Fritz TENIJIETH, Jr., Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-10426. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Aug. 9, 1994. Decided Sept. 13, 1994. Before: FLETCHER, HALL, and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Fritz Tenijieth, Jr. appeals his jury conviction for attempted aggravated sexual abuse, in violation of 18 U.S.C. Secs. 1153 , 2241(a)(1), and 2245(2)(A), and kidnapping, in violation of 18 U.S.C. Secs. 1153 and 1201. We affirm. I. 3 Tenijieth first contends he was denied various statutory and constitutional rights to a speedy trial. A. 4 Tenijieth argues that the district court erred by not dismissing his indictment pursuant to the Interstate Agreement on Detainers Act ("IADA"), 18 U.S.C.App. Sec. 2. We review de novo. E.g., United States v. Hall, 974 F.2d 1201, 1204 (9th Cir.1992). 5 The IADA provides a procedure by which a prisoner…