United States v. Steve R. Treleaven, United States of America v. Steven R. Treleaven, and Roderick D. Hier

35 F.3d 573 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Steve R. TRELEAVEN, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Steven R. TRELEAVEN, Defendant, and Roderick D. HIER, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 93-30227, 93-30228. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted July 15, 1994. Decided Sept. 13, 1994. Before: GOODWIN, D.W. NELSON, HALL, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Codefendants Steve J. Treleaven and Roderick D. Hier appeal their conditional guilty plea convictions of conspiracy to manufacture marijuana, 21 U.S.C. Secs. 846 , 841, and manufacturing marijuana. 21 U.S.C. Sec. 841 . Treleaven and Hier each raise slightly different challenges to the district court's denial of their motion to suppress. We affirm. 1 3 I. Request for a Franks Hearing on Agent Trout's Smell Testimony 4 Appellants first argue that the district court erred in refusing to hold a Franks hearing…