United States v. Martin Romero-Camilo

Good Law
35 F.3d 573·1994 WL 468009·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 32423
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 30, 199493-50249California733 words

Opinion

Opinion

35 F.3d 573 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Martin ROMERO-CAMILO, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-50249. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 23, 1994. * Decided Aug. 30, 1994. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, HUG and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Martin Romero-Camilo appeals his conviction, following a jury trial, for assaulting a federal officer with a dangerous weapon in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 222 (a), (b), using a firearm during a crime of violence in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 924 (c), being an illegal alien in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 922 (g)(5), and possession of an unregistered firearm in violation of 26 U.S.C. Sec. 5861 (d). Romero-Camilo contends the district court erred by denying his motion to suppress inculpatory statements made to Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) agents. He argues that the statements were involuntary…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.