Apple Computer, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp.

Bad Law
35 F.3d 1435·94 Daily Journal DAR 13168·1994 WL 506999·32 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1086·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 25646
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 19, 199493-16867, 93-16869 and 93-16883California7,704 words

Opinion

Opinion

Rymer, J.

Lisa and Macintosh are Apple computers. Each has a graphical user interface (“GUI”) which Apple Computer, Inc. registered for copyright as an audiovisual work. Both GUIs were developed as a user-friendly way for ordinary mortals to communicate with the Apple computer; the Lisa Desktop and the Macintosh Finder are based on a desktop metaphor with windows, icons and pull-down menus which can be manipulated on the screen with a hand-held device called a mouse. When Microsoft Corporation released Windows 1.0, having a similar GUI, Apple complained. As a result, the two agreed to a license giving Microsoft the right to use and sublicense derivative works generated by Windows 1.0 in present and future products. Microsoft released Windows 2.03 and later, Windows 3.0; its licensee, Hewlett-Packard Company (HP), introduced NewWave 1.0 and later, NewWave 3.0, which run in conjunction with Windows to make IBM-compatible computers easier to use. Apple believed that these versions exceed the license, make Windows more “Mac-like,” and infringe its copyright. This action followed.

In a series of published rulings, the district court construed the agreement to license visual displays in the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.