Lang v. Gates

Good Law
36 F.3d 73·94 Daily Journal DAR 13151·29 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 789·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 25656·94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7166
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 19, 199493-55185California1,972 words

Opinion

Opinion

36 F.3d 73 29 Fed.R.Serv.3d 789 Cheri LANG; Henry Lang; Lillian D'Antignac, Plaintiffs, and Yagman & Yagman, P.C., Real-Party-in-Interest-Appellant, v. Daryl F. GATES, Chief of Police; Reva Tooley; Robert Talcott; Herbert F. Boeckmann, II, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-55185. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted August 1, 1994. Decided Sept. 19, 1994. Stephen Yagman, Yagman & Yagman, Venice, CA, for real-party-in-interest-appellant. Lisa S. Berger, Deputy City Atty., Los Angeles, CA, for defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Before O'SCANNLAIN and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges; MERHIGE, * District Judge. O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge: 1 We must decide whether a plaintiff who first rejects a settlement offer may recover postoffer attorney's fees when he later accepts the same offer. 2 * In August 1988, Los Angeles police conducted a raid of Cheri and Henry Lang's South Central Los Angeles home. In response, the Langs filed suit against Los Angeles Police Chief Daryl Gates, the City of Los Angeles, and various individual Los Angeles police officers, city officials, and government…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.