United States v. Francisco Ortiz-Gutierrez

Good Law
36 F.3d 80·94 Daily Journal DAR 13561·1994 WL 524030·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 27053·94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7391
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 28, 199493-50833California707 words

Opinion

Opinion

Farris, J.

Francisco Ortiz-Gutierrez appeals his conviction and sentence for being found in the United States after having been deported subsequent to a conviction for an aggravated felony. 8 U.S.C. § 1326 . We affirm.

I

We reject the argument that the “found in” provision of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (a) is unconstitutionally vague. United States v. Ayala, 35 F.3d 423 (9th Cir.1994).

II

We affirm the sentence imposed by the district court. Under the Sentencing Guide lines, if a defendant convicted of violating section 1326 “previously was deported after a conviction for a felony” that did not involve a violation of immigration laws, the court must increase the offense level by four levels. U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2.(b)(l). If the prior conviction was an aggravated felony, section 2L1.2.(b)(2) requires a sixteen level increase. An aggravated felony includes a crime of violence for which the defendant was sentenced to at least five years imprisonment. U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2, comment, (n. 7).

Ortiz-Gutierrez recognizes that robbery is a crime of violence, but argues he was not sentenced to imprisonment for five years or more. He contends that the district court erred in treating his prior conviction as an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.