In re Weissbaum

Good Law
2 F. Supp. 967·1933 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1832
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 31, 1933No. 23014California978 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Kerrigan, J.

Alan C. Van Fleet, as executor for a creditor, has filed a motion to dismiss the debtor’s petition. Also motion to set aside order of reference to referee, also an answer to the ■debtor’s petition, in which he sets forth his ¡status as a creditor on two judgments for rent •oil property leased to the debtor. The answer denies that the debtor “is unable to meet his debts as they mature.” Such denial presents ■¡the only material matter. It is the condition -of a debtor requiring a general extension to ■enable him to treat all his creditors with ■equality that this new provision is aimed to relieve. The determination as to whether or not such a condition exists is not a matter to ibe heard on affidavits, or from the pleadings alone. Section 74e of the act (11 USCA § 202 (e) states: “Any creditor may appear •at or before the first meeting [of creditors] and controvert the facts alleged in the petition. In such case the court shall determine as soon as may be the issues presented, without the intervention of a jury, and unless the material allegations are sustained by the proofs shall dismiss the petition.”

The debtor’s petition here sets forth all requisite jurisdictional facts and is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.