In re Dixie Canden Oil Co.

Good Law
3 F. Supp. 534·1933 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1654
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 17, 1933No. 17446California463 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

James, J.

On the 31st day of March, 1932, the referee in bankruptcy made his order, acting on the petition of the trustee, directing'a compromise to' be made of a controversy theretofore existing between the trustee and Canden Oil Company, Limited. It was recited in the referee’s order that due notice had been given creditors. On the 24th of May, 1932, on the petition of Long Beach Petroleum Company, Limited, the referee made his order returnable on the 31st of 'May, 1932, against the trustee, Canden Oil Company, Limited, and other interested parties requiring the respondents to show cause why the confirmation of the compromise should not be set aside. That order to show cause, as appears from the referee’s record, was continued from time to time and on July 15th was ordered off calendar. Thereafter and on the 11th day of January, 1933, the final account of the trustee was approved and the trustee discharged and his bond exonerated. On April 3, 1933, the Long Beach Petroleum Company, Limited, being the same petitioner, appearing as the moving party in the order to show cause matter above referred to, filed a new petition requesting an order to show cause why the same order of compromise…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.