Anthony Bruno v. Alanco Resources, Ltd., by and Through Richard Jones, Its Chairman, and Clarence Stephenson, Cpa, Its Auditor

36 F.3d 1102 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Anthony BRUNO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ALANCO RESOURCES, LTD., By and Through Richard JONES, its Chairman, and Clarence Stephenson, CPA, its auditor, Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-17200. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 20, 1994. * Decided Sept. 22, 1994. Before: SNEED, WIGGINS and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Anthony Bruno appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment for Alanco Resources, Ltd. in Bruno's action alleging securities law violations, mail and wire fraud, and RICO violations. Bruno contends that: (1) the district court erred by finding that he failed to present any evidence to support his claims against Alanco; and (2) the district court judge was biased against him, and should have recused himself. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 3 We review de novo the district court's summary judgment. Alaska Airlines, Inc. v.…