Arthur W. Hartley, and Linda M. Greenblatt v. Stamford Towers Limited Partnership, and Shearson Lehman Hutton Inc., Armonce Sullivan, and Linda M. Greenblatt v. Shearson California Radisson Plaza Partners Limited Partnership Shearson Lehman Commercial Prop III Inc. Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc.

36 F.3d 1102 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Arthur W. HARTLEY, Plaintiff, and Linda M. Greenblatt, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STAMFORD TOWERS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Defendant, and Shearson Lehman Hutton Inc., Defendant-Appellee. Armonce SULLIVAN, Plaintiff, and Linda M. Greenblatt, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SHEARSON CALIFORNIA RADISSON PLAZA PARTNERS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; Shearson Lehman Commercial Prop III Inc.; Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc., Defendants-Appellees. Nos. 92-16802, 92-56528. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Feb. 1, 1994. Decided Aug. 26, 1994. Before: TANG, PREGERSON, and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * OVERVIEW 2 Appellant Linda Greenblatt appeals the orders of two District Courts granting the motions of Appellee Shearson Lehman Brothers, Inc. The District Courts' orders enforce the judgments and previous injunctions regarding two class action settlements involving Shearson. Specifically, the orders enjoin…