Rosenda Eufemia Aguilar-Escobar v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Good Law
36 F.3d 1102·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 33764
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 2, 199493-70087California1,296 words

Opinion

Opinion

36 F.3d 1102 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Rosenda Eufemia AGUILAR-ESCOBAR, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 93-70087. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June. 14, 1994. Decided Sept. 2, 1994. * Before: GOODWIN, PREGERSON, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Rosenda Eufemia Aguilar-Escobar, a native of El Salvador, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' (Board) order affirming the Immigration Judge's (IJ) decision denying Ms. Aguilar-Escobar's applications for political asylum and for withholding of deportation. We have jurisdiction under Section 106(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1105a(a). We vacate the Board's asylum determination and remand the case for further consideration. BACKGROUND 3 The petitioner came to the United States from El Salvador in September of 1989. She was served with an Order to Show Cause in June of 1990 and placed in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.