Guam Hakubotan, Inc. v. Furusawa Investment Corporation Julale Investment Corporation Yasuda Shoji Kk

Good Law
36 F.3d 1102·1994 WL 529566·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 33774
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 29, 199493-17304California797 words

Opinion

Opinion

36 F.3d 1102 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. GUAM HAKUBOTAN, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FURUSAWA INVESTMENT CORPORATION; Julale Investment Corporation; Yasuda Shoji KK, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-17304. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Aug. 19, 1994. Decided Sept. 29, 1994. Before: SCHROEDER, FLETCHER and FERGUSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Guam Hakubotan, Inc., appeals the order of the Appellate Division of the District Court of Guam affirming the order of the Superior Court of Guam denying relief under Guam Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b). We affirm. 3 The issue we must determine is whether the Superior Court erred in denying relief without granting an evidentiary hearing on the 60(b) motion. 4 This court in an earlier appeal reversed the Guam court and directed entry of judgment in favor of Furusawa Investment Corporation holding that the loan extension agreement at issue was a conditional sale and that the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.