Andrisani v. Palmer

36 F.3d 1102 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Albert ANDRISANI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Geoff PALMER; G.H. Palmer Associates; Saugus Colony, Ltd.; Donald Kellenberger; Gerjats, Inc.; City of Santa Clarita, et al.; Sherman Block; Glen Swanson, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-55230. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 14, 1994. * Decided Sept. 19, 1994. Before: BROWNING, WRIGHT, and CANBY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Albert Andrisani appeals pro se the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action. 1 We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 and affirm. 2 3 The California Superior Court enjoined Andrisani from entering certain real property. He appealed. While the appeal was pending he twice was arrested for entering the property in violation of the injunction. After his arrests he moved the Court of Appeal to restrain enforcement of the injunction because it was automatically stayed upon appeal. That Court denied the motion,…