People of the Territory of Guam v. Salvador Field Talladoc

Good Law
36 F.3d 1103·1994 WL 540243·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 33805
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 4, 199493-10655California1,239 words

Opinion

Opinion

36 F.3d 1103 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. PEOPLE of the TERRITORY OF GUAM, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Salvador Field TALLADOC, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-10655. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 11, 1994. * Decided Oct. 4, 1994. 1 Before: LEAVY, KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges, and MARSH, ** District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 Salvador Field Talladoc (Talladoc) appeals his convictions for having "intentionally and knowingly delivered and/or possessed with intent to deliver" marijuana. Talladoc claims that the Superior Court of Guam violated his Sixth Amendment right to confrontation when it denied his motion to strike the testimony of Edgardo Valencia (Valencia) after Valencia claimed his Fifth Amendment privilege and refused to answer certain questions on cross-examination. 4 Talladoc was prevented from inquiring about the sale of methamphetamine by Valencia which occurred more than a year after the last transaction between him and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.