United States v. Arturo Rodriguez, United States of America v. Mary E. Denogean

36 F.3d 1104 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Arturo RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mary E. DENOGEAN, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 93-10448, 93-10453. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted July 15, 1994. Decided Sept. 16, 1994. 1 Before: LEAVY and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges, and VAN SICKLE, District Judge. * 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Arturo Rodriguez and Mary Denogean appeal from their jury convictions of possession with intent to distribute marijuana and use of a firearm during a drug trafficking offense, arguing that the district court erred by admitting certain testimony (Rodriguez) and that there was insufficient evidence to support the convictions (Denogean). We affirm both convictions. 4 * Rodriguez moved in limine, asking the trial court to bar the prosecution from introducing any evidence concerning co-defendant Lyle Johns' criminal…