United States v. Mark Andrew Thompson

36 F.3d 1104 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mark Andrew THOMPSON, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-30042. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 20, 1994. * Decided Sept. 22, 1994. Before: SNEED, WIGGINS and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Mark Andrew Thompson appeals his sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction of two counts of bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 2113 (a). Thompson contends that the district court erred by treating two prior burglary offenses as "unrelated" when it calculated his criminal history score under U.S.S.G. Sec. 4A1.2. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 3 The question whether cases are related under U.S.S.G. Sec. 4A1.2 is a mixed question of law and fact, and therefore is reviewed de novo. United States v. Hummasti, 986 F.2d 337, 339 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 113 S.Ct. 2984 (1993). 4 In…