United States v. Paul Richard Arnpriester

Good Law
37 F.3d 466·94 Daily Journal DAR 13403·1994 WL 515861·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 26555·94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7271
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 23, 199493-10706California924 words

Opinion

Opinion

Noonan, J.

Paul Richard Arnpriester (Arnpriester) appeals from the judgment of the district court denying his motion for a new trial following his conviction of conspiracy to possess methamphetamine with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 ; of money laundering in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1956 (a)(l)(B)(i); of being an accessory after the fact in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 3 ; and of making a false statement to a federal agency in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001 . We reverse the judgment of the district court and remand.

PROCEEDINGS

On November 15, 1990 Arnpriester was indicted by a federal grand jury in Phoenix, Arizona for the crimes of which he was ultimately convicted. At the time of the investigation preceding the indictment the United States Attorney for Phoenix, Arizona was Stephen M. McNamee.

Following his conviction on July 26, 1991, Arnpriester appealed to this court, which affirmed each of his convictions, except that of making a false statement to the United States, and remanded for resentencing. On April 22, 1993 while his appeal here was pending, Arnpriester moved for a new trial on the grounds of newly-discovered evidence showing that the trial judge should…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.