United States v. Michael Mitchell Paul

Good Law
37 F.3d 496·94 Daily Journal DAR 13913·1994 WL 530804·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 27509·94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7526
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 3, 199493-10697California2,064 words

Opinion

Opinion

Trott, J.

Michael Mitchell Paul was convicted of voluntary manslaughter in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1112 . The district court instructed the jury using the Ninth Circuit model jury instructions for voluntary and involuntary manslaughter. We hold that the district court’s instructions constituted plain error because they failed to adequately distinguish the different mental state requirements of voluntary and involuntary manslaughter. Therefore, we reverse Paul’s conviction.

BACKGROUND FACTS

On July 18,1992, Darlene Paul died during a fight with her husband Michael Paul at their home on the Gila River Indian Reservation. Paul claims his wife came home drunk around one o’clock in the morning. According to Paul, Darlene wouldn’t tell him where their 2)t year old son, Joshua, was. An argu ment ensued during which the two traded personal insults and accusations leading to violence. During the fight, Paul strangled Darlene and banged her head against the ground. Believing he killed her, Paul took a shower to wash blood off himself and changed into new clothes. He then went to his mother’s house, told her he thought he killed Darlene, and instructed her to call the police to come pick him…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.