In Re Marino

Good Law
37 F.3d 1354·94 Daily Journal DAR 13657·30 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 795·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 27165·94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7424
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 29, 199492-56202California2,236 words

Opinion

Opinion

37 F.3d 1354 30 Fed.R.Serv.3d 795 , Bankr. L. Rep. P 76,173 In re Salvatore James MARINO; Dolores Carmen Marino, Debtors. CLASSIC AUTO REFINISHING, INC., Appellant-Cross-Appellee, v. Salvatore James MARINO, Appellee-Cross-Appellant. Nos. 92-56202, 92-56303. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Feb. 2, 1994. Decided Sept. 29, 1994. Lary Alan Rappaport, McCambridge, Deixler, Marmaro & Goldberg, Los Angeles, CA, for appellant-cross-appellee. Nicholas A. Franke, Los Angeles, CA, for appellee-cross-appellant. Appeals from the Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel. Before: D.W. NELSON, REINHARDT, and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. BRUNETTI, Circuit Judge: 1 Classic Auto Refinishing (Classic Auto) seeks review of an opinion of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (BAP) affirming the bankruptcy court's dismissal of Classic Auto's complaint against debtors Salvatore James Marino and Dolores Carmen Marino, 143 B.R. 728 . The Marinos cross appeal, arguing that the bankruptcy court should have awarded them sanctions under Bankruptcy Rule 9011. We affirm. I. 2 Classic Auto operated a business on the premises of an automobile dealership owned and operated by Salvatore…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.