Elden Clay Maynard v. City of San Jose Les White James Daniels Jack Atkinson and Nancy Jackson, Elden Clay Maynard v. City of San Jose Les White James Daniels Jack Atkinson and Nancy Jackson

Good Law
37 F.3d 1396
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 22, 199493-16529California5,211 words

Opinion

Opinion

37 F.3d 1396 66 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 123 Elden Clay MAYNARD, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CITY OF SAN JOSE; Les White; James Daniels; Jack Atkinson; and Nancy Jackson, Defendants-Appellants. Elden Clay MAYNARD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF SAN JOSE; Les White; James Daniels; Jack Atkinson; and Nancy Jackson, Defendants-Appellees. Nos. 93-16529, 93-16622. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Sept. 14, 1994. Decided Oct. 13, 1994. As Amended Nov. 22, 1994. Andrea Bryan Lynn and Michael Ross Groves, Sr. Deputy City Attys., San Jose, CA, for defendants-appellants. Robert E. Jesinger and Tania B. Rose, Wylie, McBride, Jesinger, Sure & Platten, San Jose, CA, for plaintiff-appellee. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Before: FARRIS, BEEZER, Circuit Judges, and McLAUGHLIN, District Judge. * FARRIS, Circuit Judge: 1 The City of San Jose and the individual defendants appeal the jury's partial verdicts for Elden Clay Maynard on his federal civil rights and pendent state claims. Maynard cross-appeals the district court's denial of equitable relief and its calculation of attorneys' fees. We affirm in part,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.